Like in: It’s not the fall that kills you, it’s the sudden stop.
Asked for a better alternative.
That rules out any LLM right off the bat.
I love Alfred, though. But I don’t think buying and learning a different tool is the better alternative in this case. Considering that
…
If the nuance is so small that I can’t see it, for practical purposes there isn’t any meaningful one.
Why would you suggest something you can’t recommend?
Then why are we talking about the others, again?
Let me ask this for clarification: Do you imply that my observation of you using this forum software to write what you wrote… is the product of some kind of conspiracy theory?
Yeah, that’s actually funny. Was it a military or academic bank?
That was also the time when most software was still distributed on disks, bandwidth was limited and the time ticking (if there was even a connection) and relying on that would be pretty… not so helpful.
Is this one of those nuances again?
Obviously. Since you know everything, there’s not much left for me to know.
It is my choice to use a software that requires an occasional online verification of my license. Yes, I’m still alive and I bought this software. I can live with sharing that. Nobody forced me to.
It’s both at the same time. But I can mostly only make choices for me, not for others.
Also both. I don’t own a lot of the things I mentioned, and sometimes “dumb” versions of them. I’m restricting the ones I do own more than the majority of people I know. And in the remaining cases it’s either “no other choice” or “I trust you enough, bro”.
Why are we talking about me?
My intention is to make people smarter, not dumber.
I think “why don’t you just let an ‘AI’ do it for you” is a suggestion that’s making people dumber in the long run. Especially if it’s the answer to all questions.