Article Mentions Scrivener

[b]But really, though, I don’t know why Scrivener is even mentioned here. … re-market/

It is a very interesting article and it has a few surprises in it. The popularity of Celtx being one of them. I never took it seriously, I may need to revise my opinion on that.

I have seen here in the forums a lot of people writing screenplays asking for Scrivener to do something it just wasn’t ever designed to do. If you want to be serious about writing screenplays, you need serious screenwriting software. There are no revisions or dual numbering or who knows what else here in Scrivener. My understanding is it was never intended to go straight from Scrivener to Hollywood.

I have both MMSW and FD. That is what I use.[/b]