# "Bookmarks" should be renamed "Resources"

**URL:** <https://forum.literatureandlatte.com/t/bookmarks-should-be-renamed-resources/49863>\
**Category:** Wish List\
**Created:** [May 1, 2020, 8:58pm UTC](https://forum.literatureandlatte.com/t/bookmarks-should-be-renamed-resources/49863 "2020-05-01T20:58:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 49

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JimRac](https://forum.literatureandlatte.com/user_avatar/forum.literatureandlatte.com/jimrac/32/16153_2.png) [@JimRac](https://forum.literatureandlatte.com/u/JimRac)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2021, 6:30pm UTC](https://forum.literatureandlatte.com/t/bookmarks-should-be-renamed-resources/49863/49 "2021-08-01T18:30:44Z")

</div>

> [@hallgeepers](#):
>
> Can someone please post as simplified a version of doing this “bookmarking” (of text strings/points in a manuscript) as possible?

First, just to be clear up front, Scrivener 3.0 _ **cannot** _ link text to text, for instance like OneNote can. (I think that’s what you’re looking for. If not, please clarify.)

What it _ **can** _ do is link text to documents (via internal Doc Links) and documents to documents (via Doc Bookmarks).

There are a number of ways to work around this, which may or may not be useful to you, depending on your working methods and how detailed/granular you are willing to structure your binder items.

[Here](https://forum.literatureandlatte.com/t/link-specific-text-from-one-document-to-another/50621) is a thread wherein AmberV of L&L Support discusses these workarounds. Be forewarned, it’s not simple in the reading, although depending on which method you choose, it may end up being simple in the implementation.

Best,  
Jim

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.literatureandlatte.com/t/bookmarks-should-be-renamed-resources/49863)._
