Nice try but you failed. 
[size=150]Because, you speak to me in accent sweet
Foreigners are welcomed here.
Androids are humanesque?
Butter wouldnât melt in his mouth.
Order and chaos are but two sides of the same coin.
Yetis love chocs and icecreams. [/size]
Not a paragraph. Not a sentence. Single phrase.
And if you noticed, I did the same in my response to your response to my response. Or would that be in my response to your response regarding my response?
But I think this is not the spirit of the contest sir. I think the word must be just that ⊠the word. I would give you points for creativity though.
Or maybe it would be points for better bending of the rules than previously considered⊠I like that.
And wot, eggsactly, pray tell, is the contest.
Yoors,
Eggsaperayted of Stockport 
The contest is to start paragraphs with conjunctions.
I upgraded us from just using and.
And I technically failed two times in this post.
GOTCHYA!!
Conjunctions, where Con-men, charlatans, dubious tricksters and right-wing politicians, cross each otherâs paths, are facing increasing number of closures, due to the effect upon societyâs vulnerable and disenfranchised.
Iâm counting this as the supreme win.
But only for the HAW from Stockport.
Yes⊠Vic-k is absolutely correct: The conjunctions were where the con-men met, when they were out and about.
One doesnât wish to appear pedantic (well, not, too pedantic), but the preceding sentence doesnât make any sense at all. Even when considering its provenance.
If it was: But only for the HAW from Stockport, and his selfless, humanitarian and philanthropic devotion to his fellow man, Stockport would be far more dangerous than even the Palace of Westminster. not only would it make perfect sense, syntactically, it would be an expression of a simple, but profound truth.
And you are telling me that there is only one HAW in all of Stockport? Even though I was magnanimous to allow all of them to post the same and get the supreme win? For shame Mr K. For shame.
Numpt,
Iâm not casting Nasturtiums apropos your ability to recognise genius when you encounter it, as with
and I wouldnât dream of denying you the right of exercising your prerogative in withholding your largess from others, more than likely less than worthy of such munificence.
as in: 
But in order to capitalise up to the ul-ti-mate-max-i-mum, on such generosity, we need to enlist the aid of our Super Hero, Conjunction But in his true role:
So you see numpt, no offence intended. 
Conjunctions Rule!OK!! 
Vic
Yet both coordinating conjunctions and correlative conjunctions are put in perspective when subordinating conjunctions arrive. And for the fanboys and conmen, all this really makes one consider conjunctivitis in a different wayâŠ
Dâ yâ mean like sitivitcnujnoc or civic jinn stout.
Whichever, I wouldnât ever trust a kinky aid in the flesh⊠Not even when writing.
Not even Flesch-Belinda Balloons-Kinkyaid? Lovely girl, Belinda
Vic
Well, I wonât have it said Iâm inflexible. Would that be some kind of bâonjunctions?
More of a Domin-junctionX
With a Bella Donna, iâd say itâs a donjunction. Kinky or not, iâd try to be ready and able, which is what itâs all about, this âreadybilityâ, ainât it?