# Linking internally to parts of a chapter? **URL:** \ **Category:** Scrivener\ **Tags:** support, compile, ebooks, linking\ **Created:** [January 21, 2024, 3:26pm UTC](https://forum.literatureandlatte.com/t/linking-internally-to-parts-of-a-chapter/138812 "2024-01-21T15:26:15Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 11
**Author:** ![Vincent\_Vincent](https://forum.literatureandlatte.com/user_avatar/forum.literatureandlatte.com/vincent_vincent/32/19680_2.png) [@Vincent\_Vincent](https://forum.literatureandlatte.com/u/Vincent_Vincent)\ **Post date:** [January 22, 2024, 2:11am UTC](https://forum.literatureandlatte.com/t/linking-internally-to-parts-of-a-chapter/138812/11 "2024-01-22T02:11:16Z")
You are not the first one to ask for it. Yes, some other apps have that. Here is how I do it if you are interested, and I suppose that you could leave them markers in there as a way to speed up the post-process in Sigil, and remove them once done (still in Sigil). Check this and the previous post from me in that same thread : > [@Link Specific Text from One Document to Another?](https://forum.literatureandlatte.com/t/link-specific-text-from-one-document-to-another/50621/57): > > I’ve improved the method a bit… I redesigned it using a character attributes style. So that handles removing the location tags from compile if desired. It also takes care of the comments/footnotes issue in the simplest way, as well as operating outside of the inline annotations, allowing the location tags to be treated 100% apart from any other built in switches. Thus allowing to compile with inline annotations, comments, footnotes, while removing the tags that might serve no purpose in a compi… . . . . . . . . . . . Another way of handling it : > [@Link Specific Text from One Document to Another?](https://forum.literatureandlatte.com/t/link-specific-text-from-one-document-to-another/50621/68): > > Something I think that is fallen by the wayside in this discussion is that it has revolved entirely around the notion that without this thing Scrivener is deficient, and whether or not that is the case, as opposed to what Scrivener offers instead. To expand on something I’ve said in the original post, and again in a follow-up above, is that is I feel there are strong advantages to the methods described here that anchor & link systems have strong weaknesses with. I don’t think it is quite so cle… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.literatureandlatte.com/t/linking-internally-to-parts-of-a-chapter/138812)._