Recently, I visited Writer’sLife.org and found a review of their web article, “5 Tools for Writers” that included a mistatement. They reviewed Word, Scrivener, Ulysses, Storyist and Google Docks. The problem they presented was telling their audience: "Cons: Projects likely to need exporting when finished, to HTML or Word in many cases, and export process is not perfect. Complexity can be overwhelming. strong textNot available on mobile devices—mobile writers will need to use a different editor, and sync to Scrivener."strong text The simple act of contacting them may well get their offer to correct, especially if it came from the gravitas of Scrivener “C” level officers…
1 Like
Not wanting to get my head bitten off, and its definitely not my review, but I would not necessarily disagree with the quotes. Certainly similar views are often expressed on this forum, particularly regarding compiling. However, the reviewer is obviously an android user (as I am) but unlike me is not aware that there is a fringe community supporting the little known Apple eco-system. So yes, Writer’sLife.org should be informed that Apple users are fine for mobile writers.
Could not find the article you referred to when I clicked on the link.
Probably this one: 5 Tools For Writers: A Roundup - Writer's Life.org