Revisit previous years events?

I really liked the western one. :frowning:

Agreed. It is also one of the most cohesive in reading.*

ā€“gr

  • Also includes the funniest chapter by far, namely (plot spoiler alert) the genre-busting chapter with the flying saucer.

Iā€™ve never written any sort of Western-type stuff and would welcome the opportunity; though I suspect Iā€™d go off-piste. Just the opportunity to use spittoon in context is a pull.

Likewise for the opportunity to use ā€˜spittoonā€™ out of context.

As the OP (who also somehow never got a notification that there had been replies. :confused: )ā€¦

I intended this as a joke, but appreciate @Pigfender taking me seriously.

I made the joke because I am sorely jealous of all those people with more pencil cups than I have. Iā€™ve participated every chance I could since I found out about NiaD, but I really wish Iā€™d found out sooner, because I think itā€™s a) lots and lots of fun, b) a good writing exercise, and c) a good read - particularly to find out what others wrote on ā€˜myā€™ chapters. I enjoy NiaD so much that I promote it where possible, and itā€™s been part-inspiration for an anthology or two.

That said, a lot of the fun is the uncertainty and the time pressure - exacerbated for me this year by the fact that Iā€™m busy all day tomorrow and will have to write my chapter in just a few hours. Much as Iā€™d like to get those extra pencil cups, I donā€™t think it would be the same to go back and revisit an older prompt. Iā€™d be disciplined enough not to go back and read othersā€™ approaches first, but the exercise wouldnā€™t have the same feel of spontaneity and originality to it. I think Iā€™d feel - through no oneā€™s fault - like a second-class participant for not being part of the original group.

In short, Iā€™d love to get those extra cups, but only with a real time machine and participating in real time.

On Rogā€™s questions:

  1. Is your unease about whether youā€™d personally enjoy taking part as much, knowing it was a tale already told, or is part of the unease that re-running would diminish the earlier work?

Itā€™s knowing that it was a tale already told. As anyone whoā€™s ever irretrievably lost a first draft knows, itā€™s never as good the second time around.

  1. What do people think about revisiting genres?

Absolutely fine with that. In fact, Iā€™ve been sorry that some of my favorite genres happened before I started playing. Besides, youā€™re going to run out at some point. I see no harm at all in revisiting genres, provided the plots donā€™t overlap.

On my current analysis of the concept of genre, it is a 16 dimensional space with a volume of [6 x 6 x (4x4x4x4x4x4x5x4x4x3) x 8 x 7 x 4 x 4].

Which gives Pigfender approximately 31,708,938,240 unique genres to look forward to.

And you know when you and I hit our 30,000,000,000th pencil cup weā€™re going to celebrate and we wonā€™t be thinking about the cuppa that got away.

Wait. Unless it was a sequel or part of a trilogy!