Am I being Naive?

[vic-k]

@vic-k

@nom

@vic-k

PS Actually, unless I’m very much mistaken, didn’t Paul make some fleeting reference to Piketty in his opening talk. If he’s moving in that kind of company while researching his book, [size=150]maybe[/size] he’s not [size=150]too[/size] head-in-clouds … eh?

I can make fleeting references to the Pope if that will help lend credence to my arguments. I’ll even include reference to Plato, Socrates, Aristotle and the [size=150]Dread Pirate Roberts[/size] : wossee gorra do wi’it? for good measure…

Listen pal,
You could say ,“xp[23[ior]mnbqv 2340iormv 2CWEPREKFMBMV ]2R0[29IRUNVQ2][34R009JBN\N0NRV2IR]V]R[P[AWIRNBQ234IRV2EKFPO092FIV”
and as long as you signed it ‘nom’, t would’t need added credence, cos you signature would lend all the credence it required.

I’ve reread that and realised it could be taken two ways … negatively and positively. I’m very sorry mate, but just let me reassure y’ I’ts supposed t’ taken negatively. .oops! sorry

[nom]

@vic-k

@vic-k

@nom

I can make fleeting references to the Pope if that will help lend credence to my arguments. I’ll even include reference to Plato, Socrates, Aristotle and the [size=150]Dread Pirate Roberts[/size] : wossee gorra do wi’it? for good measure…

Listen pal,
You could say ,“xp[23[ior]mnbqv 2340iormv 2CWEPREKFMBMV ]2R0[29IRUNVQ2][34R009JBN\N0NRV2IR]V]R[P[AWIRNBQ234IRV2EKFPO092FIV”
and as long as you signed it ‘nom’, t would’t need added credence, cos you signature would lend all the credence it required.

I’ve reread that and realised it could be taken two ways … negatively and positively. I’m very sorry mate, but just let me reassure y’ I’ts supposed t’ taken negatively. .oops! sorry

That’s alright, Maude knows where you live…

[vic-k]

@nom

That’s alright, Maude knows where you live…

S[size=85]H[/size][size=50]I……[/size]

[vic-k]

theguardian.com/books/live/2 … capitalism
Just noticed this on t’ Grurniad website. I’ve posted it here, by way of it being irrefutable proof positive, beyond all reasonable doubt and ditherence being both priori and posteriori. <-- Anyway … wotevva ('aven’t read it yet )

4-50pm. Just read the Q&A session and some of the comment section, too. Gorra nedache! Have to go back and reread it, see if it develops into a full blown migraine.

found this in comment section garynorth.com/public/14073.cfm <— definitely not a fan … not saying he’s wrong, though.
vic

7pm Just finished watching this: youtube.com/watch?v=7bwK2vyLrLI I’ve developed a fond regard for Joseph Stiglitz, over the past few years. I believe him to be a genuine, decent human being. Definitely not given to hyperbole, like me. His constant reference to Adam Smith and his apparent perspicacity (Smith’s), concerning the pitfalls inherent in Capitalism, has me grinning like the proverbial Cheshire cat … cos my copy of our Adam’s The Wealth of Nations: Books 1-3, residing within touching distance from where I’m sitting, is sandwiched twixt copies of Robert Burton’s Anatomy of Melancholy and Dorothy. L Sayers’ translation of Dante’s Cantica 1: HELL, from his The Devine Comedy I’m not sure whether to seek any profound interpretation regarding their intimacy on t’shelf. Coincidence … I’m sure it is … init?!