I do hope that you’re not dissing my favourite author! There’s no point looking for dirty bits in Wilkie Collins. Everyone knows that the Victorians only had sex and violence subliminally, probably because these popular pastimes weren’t invented properly until the 1960s (or so I’ve been told). Anyhow, while Wilkie Collins may not go into the detail of any alleged subliminality, just about everything he writes deals with the aftermath of immoral behaviour. You’ll just have to use your imagination to fill in the gaps!
If you’re a third of the way through and the author has not hooked you with hero, or plot, or mood, or background, or secondary characters or humor or sex or violence or food, I say toss it. No matter who wrote it.
Collins, once enormously popular, is now an acquired taste, and not an easily-acquired one at that.
Whatever is going on subconsciously, Im not sure of but on a conscious level, at the moment, most of my lifes occurrences, must be happening subliminally, because as far as I can figure out, nothings happening.
Have you read Rebecca's Tale, by Sally Beauman? Its du Mauriers Rebecca, twenty years hence. Having swapped it for Moonstone( which I will resume later), I found some quite stark similarities between Collinss book and Beaumans. Check it out, see what you think.
The dearth of sex and violence, notwithstanding, (in the book!!), I am, actually intrigued by the plot`s final resolution.
Whether or not I become intimate with The Woman in White, will most likely depend upon, just how adept I become at subliminal fornication.
Welcome to 'The Little Shop of Horrors’ or The Good Ship,as we call Scriv.
Strange you should resurrect this thread, because Ive very recently finished [i]'Moonstone',[/i] and I have only a hundred pages to go with, 'The Woman in White'. Definitely a dearth of 'raunch'. You wouldnt think Collins and Charlie Dickens were a couple of likely lad, where the ladies and the hostelries were concerned, or so I`ve been led to believe.
You need to revisit Hardy to get your fix of Victorian raunch. Although even there it’s understated. Gentlemen (and Ladies) may have done it to distraction, but they didn’t really talk about it–and certainly didn’t write about it.
But Bathsheba Everdene? Tess d’Urberville? Eustacia Vye? Sue Bridehead?
All still major boner material a century and change later.
As was (from the Bronte who could write), the delectable Catherine Earnshaw.
My wife s dissertation at Teacher Training College, Huddersfield, Yorkshire, was on the Brontes.
So we`ve been all over the Bronte trail up to, ‘Top Withins’, numerous time. Out on those moors, is a very, ‘Sap Rising’, experience. If you get my drift 8)
Hope you were not such as dog as to fail to take your hat off, is all I can say.
Martin Cruz Smith refers to some written raunch (erotica, the Bishop called it, of course, dirty books for the upper claws) which predated Victoria by several hundred years in “Rose”. Speaking as one who has suffered some nasty bouts of malaria, and exalted in one (cerebral on that occasion – best trip I EVER had, why, of why, did they inject the chloroquin? I didn’t ask for it), and who is a bit of a student of social development, it is an excellent book.
Shame on you for having such a quaint view of the Victorian era. For your penance, I proscribe Michel Foucault’s ‘History of Sexuality, Volume 1’. Read through that, and tell me again that Victorian’s didn’t have sex on the brain in the most twisted of ways.
Dont fall into trap siren sets for the unwary. Theres no two ways about this!! Siren is a multi-substance abusing, redhot mama, of a Femme Fatale. When she posts, youll see little curls of steam escaping from Mac`s casing
Sex and Violence you say Vic-k? Since most of this discussion is well above my pay grade I would have remained silent but when I heard your avid interest in “Sex and Violence” I thought of a tune that would sum it up for you very well.
WIlkie Collins write good books i have read The WOmen in WHite …the book is gud to read if you like detective novels …this book is kind of very mysterious n interesting i suggest to read The WOmen in white from the reading u will get to knoe why the title is kept the WOmen in white …i hope u enjoy reading