I reread my previous comments. As I said, I was frustrated. I described the problem in terms that I believe should have been clear, and I was having no joy getting through to you. Please accept my apology if you took anything I wrote as being incredibly rude.
I believe a cause of miscommunication stems from a difficulty to see things from the perspective of someone who doesn’t understand the workings of the program as well as you understand it. Again, this may sound blunt, but I’m not mentioning this to be rude or insulting, so please don’t take it that way. I have been a tech support representative for a software company, so I’m saying this from experience.
If you reflect on this, it may help to improve the way you interact with customers, who, after all, are the ones who spend the money to keep the company going. Here is an example of what I’m talking about: When you say " perhaps you could provide a reproduction case that allows me to see the issue for myself," I don’t understand what you are asking for. What is it that you would like me to supply you with and where should I send it?
Now, when I say there is a greater than symbol on the page, and I tell you that I haven’t typed it in anywhere, then you need to work from the supposition that I am supplying you with a fact and work from there, instead of saying, “we didn’t do it.” Because that is only going to provoke a response of “neither did I.” And that isn’t helpful. I have checked my address book, and there is no > after my street address. I would include this in a screenshot, but I would be revealing my address online,
I will add that I have owned Scrivener for a long time, but as I haven’t done much writing over the past few years, I haven’t used it much. Now I am attempting to make an earnest attempt to learn the program, using more than one source for reference. I have an IT background and have done some object-oriented programming. When I notice an issue in a program, I’m usually, but not always, correct.