Of course, this has been suggested a few times before: google.com/search?q=scriven … lder+names
And of course, the general response seems to be: “use Find & Replace!” but again of course, that isn’t always reliable, or convenient.
I just started using Scrivener yesterday, to dabble in writing a short story, and I apologize if there’s already a feature to do what I’m asking for, but please read this post fully to see exactly what I mean.
—
I actually began working in Apple’s Pages before I ran into this problem: Naming characters and places.
The “feel” of the names is very important to my story, but I obviously cannot get them all “right” on the first try. So I want to continue writing my story with “placeholder” or temporary names and then change them later, trying different spellings, combinations etc. until they all look just right to me.
I downloaded Scrivener expecting that a tool advertised for storywriters must have a feature to help with what seems to be a common problem in story writing!
So far I haven’t been able to find one, so here is my feature request/suggestion:
-
Let us define project-wide “variables” like $hero$ and $hero.hometown$
-
Those variables must be replaced with their assigned values at all times, except when an option similar to “Show Invisibles” is checked.
-
During editing, typing a $ will display a list of autocomplete suggestions for our variables.
-
Variables should only affect display and output, not any other operation like Find/Replace. So searching for $hero1$ will hit all occurrences of that variable in the text, instead of searching for occurrences of the variable’s value (e.g. not “Bilbo”).
Usage Example:
I may begin writing “In a hole in the ground there lived a $herorace$.”
I then open the Variables Inspector or what have you, and add an entry for $herorace$ = “Bobbit”
After that, my document will be displayed like “In a hole in the ground there lived a Bobbit.”
If I compile, print, share or export it any other way, it must output as Bobbit instead of $herorace$
Hmm, but wait, that doesn’t feel right. I think I’ll change $herorace$ to “Gobbit”
And so on, I’ll try different variations until I hit the right tone.
—
So there you have it. Please consider adding a feature like this and thank you for reading.
P.S. In the future you might extend this to introduce full “programability” or “scripting” into Scrivener, which could really put this app ahead of the competition, but that’s another topic for another day.
(edited for formatting)