So far, I’ve reviewed most of the features and viewed all of the videos. I have to say that I love Scrivener 2.0’s potential!
I do have a question that may become a feature request.
I would like to generate Regency England names. Is there a way to seed the generator to generate period names? If not, I would like to request such an option.
You can add your own lists. You just need to get a list of regency names - or type in a list - in Excel or Numbers, save as a .csv file, then you can load the list into the generate. I spent weeks typing in and formatting thousands of names, so I won’t be adding any more in a hurry, but if users would like to create and share their own lists, that would be great.
Glad you see the potential of Scrivener for your own work!
What a remarkable co-incidence! We were conveying our admiration with regards to this redoubtable utility to our old friends Frederic Foskett and Uriah Pipe only the other day.
Yours sincerely,
Misty MacFarlane &
Tavish Silcock-Warmington, (former of this parish)
Thanks! It took bloomin’ ages to input all the names, especially going through the entire Collins Shorter Dictionary (that’s shorter?!) to find all nouns that could potentially become fun surnames, but I do love the results.
All the best,
Polly Puffin, Ross Roth-Richter and Harvey Hird-Hitcher.
I use it by setting the number of results to 1. Then set the other parameters, hit “generate” and Fate returns… THE name. Okay, that worked once. The other time I kept trying until Fate finally got it right. This is the thing with Fate. Sometimes you have to massage the results.
I did what Keith said and made lists of many Polish names from online dictionaries/databases and with the help of textwrangler to erase unneeded things. very nice!
suddenly, after adding these names, I was met by
Justyna Maria Basta
Anna Julia Gaidosz
Alfonsyna Julia Kasprzynski
and then with Patrycjusz Rudolf Poddebski, Paweł Czech Tyra, and Bronisław Erazm Sokolski.