wish L&L front page wasn't broken

Sounds like characters from something written by the Marquis de Sade
supervert.com/elibrary/marquis_de_sade/ may contain rude words. :open_mouth:

Are we talking about you and me or something else? if we are talking about us, then you need to use something more … positive?.. than may…

http://supervert.com/elibrary/marquis_de_sade/ ‘may contain rude words’
[size=150]^[/size] :unamused: is a warning for the benefit of those aboard Scriv, possessed of delicate sensibilities. Not that anyone spring immediately t’ mind.
If Colleen discovers the fact that you are proposing the use of profanities, obscenities and expletives, in open forum on the WWW, you’ll rue the day you were born!! Doesn’t bear thinking about.!!

When I say “but vic-k” her normal reaction is to throw up her hands, roll her eyes and then say “whatever make you feel good”. Then she walks away. You are an excellent excuse for my behavior. Especially the bad behavior.

[size=150]Syd Shelton’s best photograph: a stagecrashing punk in Norfolk[/size]
theguardian.com/artanddesig … -interview
[size=150]This wot y’ think of us … eh, yossi?[/size]

Wot your wife is thinking when she does that, is: ‘Of all the vic-k type guys out there, that I could’ve chosen from, I had to end up with a Jaysen!! tch!tch!’
My wife has a certain expression that she saves for whenever I utter a profundity or engage her in invigorating philosophical discussion apropos, this-or-that, or worreva. 'tis a look of incredulity. It seems to say: 'Of all the men out there, I ended up with you!!"

Can’t win ‘em all, can y’? :frowning:

We can win some?

When did you plan on telling me I was allowed to win a few?!

Well … look at it like this, If you can say, “I suppose it could’ve been worse.” :confused: Consider that: A WIN … OK? … got that? …good.

I’ve still got a neck stump… it could have been worse.

Like that?

Well, errrhmmm … if that’s the best y’can do … yeah, run wi’ that, numpt … run wi’ it.

You guys are so silly.

But back to the point of this discussion:

L&L needs a new webpage.

Why? :confused:

Cause I’m getting bored of both of you two old partridges dancing it out like the sun don’t shine.

You’re wrong. we are deadly serious. And I don’t dance.

Oh, and the web page thing too. Just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean it should be changed. I don’t think windows as a platform has any value. Yet you don’t hear me making a big stink about the windows version of scrivener.

youtube.com/watch?v=J5ya_Gq8d4Q

Jaysen, now, now, don’t unfurl ur dance on me.

Watching you two reminds me of my grandpa and his old cronies talking silly and pointless things on park benches on Saturday afternoons. It’s nice to think about but after enough of it, one just wanted to pick up his heels and run naked into the sunset.

Why does Scriv need a new webpage?

Take care,

Vic Partridge

Mr Vic partridge,

Cause it looks cheap.

Is this a word-play I see before me?: cheap for cheep, the call of the partridge enature.com/fieldguides/deta … rPageNum=7
youtube.com/watch?v=l0nUWQV3ZDE
The concept of beauty is subjective, at best … as young Billy S, put it succinctly enough, when he said,
“Good yosimitiy, Scriv’s beauty, though but mean,
Needs not the painted flourish of your praise:
Beauty is bought by judgement of the eye,
Not utter’d by base sale of chapmen’s tongues.”

gr’s opening post, lamented the broken state of L&Ls front page. A state for with, Ioa proclaimed most vociferously at high decibel levels, “Mea culpa! Mea culpa!”, whilst prostrating himself at our feet, in supplication. For which, in their magnanimity, Scriv’s crew of miscreants, dead-beats and no-hopers, have forgiven the poor slob.
Since the OP has been granted his wish, so to speak, I hereby take my leave of this thread, once again, I might add.
youtube.com/watch?v=J5ya_Gq8d4Q I abhor off-topicing, with a vengeance!
Adieu mon brave homme,
Vic Partridge

Yeah…

It looks cheap.